Re: Problem with mdadm 2.6.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday July 27, tmb@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> as for --bitmap, can it be added to an existing array ?

Yes.
> 
> What is the better choice, bitmap=internal or bitmap=<some_file> ?

Internal is easier.

The command is
   mdadm --grow /dev/mdXXX --bitmap=internal

This could have a negative impact on performance.  The degree depends
a lot on your workload.
If you notice a reduction in write speed that is not acceptable, and
if removing the bitmap (mdadm --grow /dev/mdXXX --bitmap=none) fixes
the problem, then we can try to find an alternate solution.

> 
> I'd hate to have to recreate the array, as I have about 1.2GB of data on 
> it...

There is no need for that.

NeilBrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux