Re: AWFUL reshape speed with raid5.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What happens if you use 0.90 superblocks?

An even more spectacular explosion. Really quite impressive, actually.
Just a small sample of the >800 lines:

Jul 28 13:18:54 turnip kernel: itmap 9: invalid bitmap page 9: invalid
bitmap page 9: invalid bitmap p9: invalid bitmap pag9: invalid bitmap
9: invalid bitmap page9: invalid bitmap pa9: invalid bitmap pag9:
invalid bitmap 9: invalid bitmap 9: invalid bitmap pag9: invalid
bitmap page9: invalid bitmap 9: invalid bitmap 9: invalid bitmap
page9: invalid bitmap pa9: invalid bitmap pag9: invalid bitmap pa9:
invalid bitmap p9: invalid bitmap page 9: invalid bitmap page 9:
invalid bitmap p9: invalid bitmap 9: invalid bitmap page9: invalid
bitmap pag9: invalid bitmap pag9: invalid bitmap page9: invalid bitmap
9: invalid bitmap pag9: invalid bitmap page9: invalid bitmap pag9:
invalid bitmap9: invalid bitmap page9: invalid bitmap pag9: invalid
bitmap pa9: invalid bitmap page9: invalid bitmap pa9: invalid bitmap
p9: invalid bitmap page 9: invalid bitmap page 9: invalid bit9:
invalid bitmap pa9: invalid bitmap page 9: invalid bitmap pag9:
invalid bitmap page9: invalid bitmap 9: invalid bitmap pa9: invalid
bitmap page9: invalid

(Note the page -> pag -> p ... variations/corruption/whatever).

and

Jul 28 13:18:55 turnip kernel: i9: i9: 9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9:
i9: 9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: i9: i9: 9: in9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9:
i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: i9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: i9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: i9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
Jul 28 13:18:55 turnip kernel:  9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: i9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: i9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9:
i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: i9: 9: i9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9:
9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: 9: invalid bitmap page request:
222 (> 122)



> Also, are these sata ports on the mobo or sata ports on a pci-based mobo?

The ports are on a PCI-E motherboard, MCP55 chipset. The
motherboard/chipset/whatever is *not* the problem.

-- 
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux