On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:45:23AM -0400, Christopher Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, CaT wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:00:05AM -0400, Christopher Hicks wrote:
> >>We had a drive die in a RAID1 array. I've tried to bring it back so we
> >...
> >> Raid Level : raid0
> >
> >These two things seem to contradict...
>
> Oh no. I don't suppose there's any chance that mdadm is wrong about what
> RAID level that chunk was at.
I don't know to be honest. There are two possibilities as far as I can
see:
1. it is a raid 1 array so you might try creating it as raid 1 with a
drive missing and seeing if there's a valid filesystem there. don't know
if this will destroy useful data though.
2. you only think you had a raid1 array, in which case you're probably
screwed as the data would be interleved between the two drives.
--
"Police noticed some rustling sounds from Linn's bottom area
and on closer inspection a roll of cash was found protruding
from Linn's anus, the full amount of cash taken in the robbery."
- http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/robber-hides-loot-up-his-booty/2008/05/09/1210131248617.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
