On Wednesday June 18, chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> mdadm --assemble --force repeatedly segfaults when run on a raid6 array with
> more than two components marked as failed, so at least one needs its event
> count forcibly updated. sb->events is accessed with sb NULL in update_super1,
> called from Assemble (line 667 of Assemble.c). I think the following patch is
> correct:
>
> diff -uNrp mdadm-2.6.7.orig/Assemble.c mdadm-2.6.7/Assemble.c
> --- mdadm-2.6.7.orig/Assemble.c 2008-06-18 20:23:36.000000000 +0100
> +++ mdadm-2.6.7/Assemble.c 2008-06-18 20:23:47.000000000 +0100
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ int Assemble(struct supertype *st, char
> continue;
> }
> tst = dup_super(st);
> - if (tst->ss->load_super(st,fd, NULL)) {
> + if (tst->ss->load_super(tst, fd, NULL)) {
> close(fd);
> fprintf(stderr, Name ": RAID superblock disappeared from %s - not updating.\n",
> devices[chosen_drive].devname);
>
Yes, definitely.
Thanks.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
