On Mon, June 9, 2008 6:52 am, Gavin Hamill wrote: > Hi :) > > I've had a drive die recently, and took the opportunity to upgrade my > aging Debian sarge box to etch. Once the new OS was running and I had > finished beating booting from /dev/md0 with a blunt instrument, I turned > my attention to the data raid-sets... there's only one I can't sort out, > and of course.. it's the biggest one :) > > eddie:~# cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > md3 : active raid5 hda4[1] hdg4[2] > 349702144 blocks level 5, 1024k chunk, algorithm 0 [3/2] [_UU] > > eddie:~# mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/hde5 > mdadm: add new device failed for /dev/hde5 as 3: Invalid argument Do you get any kernel messages when this fails? dmesg | tail > As you can see, only hde thinks it's a spare, when I want it to replace > that 'removed' in all cases. What can I do? Given that the --add failed, this is normal. The device is added to the array as a spare, then recover starts. Once recovery finished the device so changed to be a full member of the array. NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html