On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Lars Täuber wrote:
> The lost aoe-device is correctly marked as faulty but the the raid is
> not usable for a copying processes any more although the remaining
> device should be enough for a RAID1. There was no change after
> removing the faulty device from md9.
>
> Is it possible that one faulty aoe-device blocks the aoe-module anyhow
> so that all other aoe devices aren't accessible anymore? Or is the
> RAID subsystem responsible for this?
It should be easy to test: when the RAID hangs, try to read directly
from the remaining device ("dd if=/dev/etherd/e11.1 ..."). If that also
hangs, then it is an AoE issue.
Gabor
--
---------------------------------------------------------
MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
---------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
