Hi Bernd, Bernd Schubert <bs@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > > Here the conf file: > > monosan:~ # cat /etc/mdadm.conf > > DEVICE /dev/sd[ab][0-9] /dev/dm-* > > ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 UUID=d9d31de2:e6dbd3c3:37c7ea09:882a64e5 > > ARRAY /dev/md3 level=raid1 num-devices=2 > > UUID=a8687183:a79e514c:ca492c4b:ffd4384f ARRAY /dev/md4 level=raid6 > > num-devices=15 spares=1 UUID=cfcbe071:f6766d8f:0f1ffefa:892d09c3 ARRAY > > /dev/md9 level=raid1 num-devices=2 name=9 > > UUID=db687150:614e76fd:28feefc0:b1aae572 > > > > All dm-* devices are really distinctive. I could post the > > /etc/multipath.conf too if you want. here is the file: monosan:~ # cat /etc/multipath.conf # # This configuration file is generated by Yast, do not modify it # manually please. # defaults { polling_interval "0" user_friendly_names "yes" # path_grouping_policy "multibus" } blacklist { # devnode "*" wwid "SATA_WDC_WD1600YS-01_WD-WCAP02964085" wwid "SATA_WDC_WD1600YS-01_WD-WCAP02965435" } blacklist_exceptions { } multipaths { mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ02TBK" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ0185Y" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ02QRQ" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ0204G" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ02TVQ" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ012AL" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ00PHN" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ01BYF" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ026J1" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ01G09" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ02461" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ013GW" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ01835" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ01C49" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ02TBZ" } mutlipath { wwid "SATA_ST31000340NS_5QJ01JSF" } } > I only have very little experience with multipathing, but please send your > config. The fact you really do use multipathing only confirms my initial > guess it is a multipath and not a md problem. But when I assemble the array after a clean shutdown after it has been initially synced there is no problem. Just if the array was degraded it has such duplicated superblocks. How comes? Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html