Re: RAID5 in sync does not populate slots sequentially, shows array as (somewhat) faulty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
The reason I did this was because /dev/sda and /dev/sdb used to be part of a RAID1 array, but were now used as system disk and home disk respectively. I was afraid that mdadm would pick up on some of the lingering RAID superblocks on those disks when reporting, so I shredded them both using 'shred -n 1' and reinstalled.


This is irrelevant to 1.x superblocks, and largely insignificant for 0.9 superblocks (baring some really bizzare cases). In either case mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/XX (possibly executed multiple times) would save you a lot of disk churning :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux