On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:53:06 -0700, Maurice Hilarius <maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Michael Guntsche wrote:
>> ..
>> While the result for XFS is different, reading is actually faster, the
>> differnece between xfs and xfs on lvm is still there.
>>
>>
> Great. At least now the figures are more realistic.
>> pvcreate was called so that the first PE starts exactly at 256K, no
sunits
>> where used with mkfs.xfs for the lvm case.
>>
>> I still do not understand the read output at all.
>>
> That is certainly a puzzle.
Is it possible that my computer is just too slow to get good read results?
I wonder since writing seems to be nearly similar.
I just tried with an ext3 FS.
Version 1.03c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec
%CP
lvm-al8g-ext3 8G 45029 27 22436 29 55034 45 192.0
3
While reading is a little bit faster it's nowhere near the speed I get on
md0 itself.
Kind regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
