Re: raid1 error handling and faulty drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Brown wrote:
I've recently become aware that we really need FAILFAST - possibly for
all IO from RAID1/5.  Modern drives don't need any retry at the OS
level - if the retry in the firmware cannot get the data, nothing will.
>
Thanks.  I agree that we do need something along these lines.  It
might be a while before I can give the patch the brainspace it
deserves as I am travelling this fortnight.

NeilBrown

Neil,

Was anything ever done with this idea? I can throw my hat into the this-is-a-big-problem ring. I oftentimes have a RAID1 disk fail on a heavy-I/O system and the system basically needs to be power-cycled if it is to come back up within the hour (any OS access to that RAID will hang).

Any word would be appreciated.

Philip
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux