Re: RAID10 far (f2) read throughput on random and sequential / read-ahead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nat Makarevitch <nat <at> makarevitch.org> writes:

> 'md' performs wonderfully

> random access performance remains stable and high (450
> IOPS with 48 threads, 20% writes - 10% fsync'ed), even with a fairly high
> read-ahead (16k).

Mystery solved, sorry for the noise

Explanation: I use the 'randomio' tool and searched in its sourcecode for the
various 'advise' calls (posix_fadvise(2), madvise(2)...) and forgot to check the
open call (it uses O_DIRECT!)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux