Re: RAID needs more to survive a power hit, different /boot layout for example (was Re: draft howto on making raids for surviving a disk crash)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
[]
> But that's *exactly* what I have -- well, 5GB -- and which failed. I've
> modified /etc/fstab system to use data=journal (even on root, which I
> thought wasn't supposed to work without a grub option!) and I can
> power-cycle the system and bring it up reliably afterwards.

Note also that data=journal effectively doubles the write time.
It's a bit faster for small writes (because all writes are first
done into the journal, i.e. into the same place, so no seeking
is needed), but for larger writes, the journal will become full
and data found in it needs to be written to proper place, to free
space for new data.  Here, if you'll continue writing, you will
have more than 2x speed degradation, because of a) double writes,
and b) more seeking.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux