Re: In this partition scheme, grub does not find md information?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> 
>> It is exactly what the names implies - a new kind of RAID :) The setup
>> you describe is not RAID10 it is RAID1+0. As far as how linux RAID10
>> works - here is an excellent article:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels#Linux_MD_RAID_10
> 
> Thanks. Let's just say that the md(4) man page was finally penetrating
> my brain, but the Wikipedia article helped a great deal. I had thought
> md's RAID10 was more "standard."

It is exactly "standard" - when you create it with default settings
and with even number of drives (2, 4, 6, 8, ...), it will be exactly
"standard" raid10 (or raid1+0, whatever) as described in various
places on the net.

But if you use odd number of drives, or if you pass some fancy --layout
option, it will look differently.  Still not suitable for lilo or
grub, at least their current versions.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux