Re: In this partition scheme, grub does not find md information?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:02:57AM -0600, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> Neil, thanks for writing. A couple of follow-up questions to you and the 
> group:
> 
> If the answers above don't lead to a resolution, I can create two RAID1 
> pairs and join them using LVM. I would take a hit by using LVM to tie 
> the pairs intead of RAID0, I suppose, but I would avoid the performance 
> hit of multiple md drives on a single physical drive, and I could even 
> run a hot spare through a sparing group. Any comments on the performance 
> hit -- is raid1L a really bad idea for some reason?

You can of cause construct a traditional raid-1+0 in Linux as you describe here,
but this is different from linux raid10 (with its different layout
possibilities). And constructing two grub/lilos on two disks for a raid1
on /boot seems to be the right way for a reasonably secured system.

best regards
keld
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux