Re: [PATCH] Use new sb type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> David Greaves wrote:
>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> This makes 1.0 the default sb type for new arrays.
>>>
>>
>> IIRC there was a discussion a while back on renaming mdadm options
>> (google "Time
>> to  deprecate old RAID formats?") and the superblocks to emphasise the
>> location
>> and data structure. Would it be good to introduce the new names at the
>> same time
>> as changing the default format/on-disk-location?
>>
>> David
> 
> Also wasn't the concession to make 1.1 default instead of 1.0 ?
> 
IIRC Doug Leford did some digging wrt lilo + grub and found that 1.1 and 1.2
wouldn't work with them. I'd have to review the thread though...

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux