Re: raid10: unfair disk load?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Nelson wrote:

My own tests on identical hardware (same mobo, disks, partitions,
everything) and same software, with the only difference being how
mdadm is invoked (the only changes here being level and possibly
layout) show that raid0 is about 15% faster on reads than the very
fast raid10, f2 layout. raid10,f2 is approx. 50% of the write speed of
raid0.

Have you tested a stacked RAID 10 made up of 2 drive RAID1 arrays, striped together into a RAID0.

I have found this configuration to offer very good performance, at the cost of slightly more complexity.

Regards,

Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux