Re: raid10: unfair disk load?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Janek Kozicki wrote:
> Michael Tokarev said: (by the date of Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:53:38 +0300)
> 
>>> I just noticed that with Linux software RAID10, disk
>>> usage isn't equal at all, that is, most reads are
>>> done from the first part of mirror(s) only.
> 
> what's your kernel version? I recall that recently there have been
> some works regarding load balancing.

It was in my original email:

> The kernel is 2.6.23 but very similar behavior is
> shown by earlier kernels as well.  Raid10 stripe
> size is 256Mb, but again it doesn't really matter
> other sizes behave the same here.

Strange I missed the new raid10 development you
mentioned (I follow linux-raid quite closely).
Lemme see...  no, nothing relevant in 2.6.24-rc5
(compared with 2.6.23), at least git doesn't show
anything interesting.  What change(s) you're
referring to?

Thanks.

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux