On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:39:28PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > What to do is to give repairfs a try for each permutation, > but again without letting it to actually fix anything. > Just run it in read-only mode and see which combination > of drives gives less errors, or no fatal errors (there > may be several similar combinations, with the same order > of drives but with different drive "missing"). Ugggh. > It's sad that xfs refuses mount when "structure needs > cleaning" - the best way here is to actually mount it > and see how it looks like, instead of trying repair > tools. It self protection - if you try to write to a corrupted filesystem, you'll only make the corruption worse. Mounting involves log recovery, which writes to the filesystem.... > Is there some option to force-mount it still > (in readonly mode, knowing it may OOPs kernel etc)? Sure you can: mount -o ro,norecovery <dev> <mtpt> But it you hit corruption it will still shut down on you. If the machine oopses then that is a bug. > thread prompted me to think. If I can't force-mount it > (or browse it using other ways) as I can almost always > do with (somewhat?) broken ext[23] just to examine things, > maybe I'm trying it before it's mature enough? ;) Hehe ;) For maximum uber-XFS-guru points, learn to browse your filesystem with xfs_db. :P Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
