Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Scobie said:     (by the date of Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:32:08 +1300)

> This was the bug I was thinking of:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=116003247912732&w=2

This bug says that it only with mdadm 1.x:

   "If a drive is added to a raid1 using older tools
    (mdadm-1.x or raidtools) then it will be included
    in the array without any resync happening."

But I have here:

# mdadm --version
mdadm - v2.5.6 - 9 November 2006

maybe I stumbled on another bug?

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux