Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Goswin von Brederlow said:     (by the date of Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:17:51 +0100)

> Strange. That is exactly how I always do it and it always just worked.
> mdadm should start syncing on any spare as soon as a disk fails or you
> add the spare to a degraded array afaik. No special "start now"
> interaction needed.

Thanks for your confirmation. I cannot explain this behaviour - I
just started using mdadm. If anybody here wants, I can remove the
drive and add this again, to see if I can duplicate this "bug" (?).
If so - then tell me what debug information you do need and I will
give it to you.

Anyway, it seems that this command 

  mdadm --assemble --update=resync /dev/md1 /dev/hda3 /dev/sda3 /dev/hdc3

worked, becasue `mdadm -D /dev/md1` says that array is in
"State : active" (not degraded).

best regards
-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux