Alberto Alonso wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 15:16 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Not in the older kernel versions you were running, no.
These "old versions" (specially the RHEL) are supposed to be
the official versions supported by Redhat and the hardware
vendors, as they were very specific as to what versions of
Linux were supported.
So the vendors of the failing drives claimed that these kernels were
supported? That's great, most vendors don't even consider Linux
supported. What response did you get when you reported the problem to
Redhat on your RHEL support contract? Did they agree that this hardware,
and its use for software raid, was supported and intended?
Of all people, I would think you would
appreciate that. Sorry if I sound frustrated and upset, but
it is clearly a result of what "supported and tested" really
means in this case. I don't want to go into a discussion of
commercial distros, which are "supported" as this is nor the
time nor the place but I don't want to open the door to the
excuse of "its an old kernel", it wasn't when it got installed.
The problem is in the time travel module. It didn't properly cope with
future hardware, and since you have very long uptimes, I'm reasonably
sure you haven't updated the kernel to get fixes installed.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
