Re: Implementing low level timeouts within MD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Doug> This isn't an md problem, this is a low level disk driver
Doug> problem.  Yell at the author of the disk driver in question.  If
Doug> that driver doesn't time things out and return errors up the
Doug> stack in a reasonable time, then it's broken.  Md should not,
Doug> and realistically can not, take the place of a properly written
Doug> low level driver.

I agree with Doug: nothing prevents you from using md above very slow
drivers (such as remote disks or even a filesystem implemented over a
tape device to make it extreme). Only the low-level drivers know when
it is appropriate to timeout or fail.

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@xxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.rfc1149.net/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux