Re: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Message from neilb@xxxxxxx ---------
    Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:51:08 +1000
    From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
 Subject: Re: Help RAID5 reshape Oops / backup-file
      To: Nagilum <nagilum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
      Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Thursday October 11, nagilum@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Ok, after looking in "Grow.c" I can see that the backup file is
removed once the critial section has passed:

		if (backup_file)
			unlink(backup_file);

		printf(Name ": ... critical section passed.\n");

Since I had passed that point I'll try to find out where
Grow_restart() stumbles. By looking at it I'm not even sure it's able
to "resume" and not just restart. :-/


It isn't a problem that you didn't specify a backup-file.
If you don't, mdadm uses some spare space on one of the new drives.
After the critical section has passed, the backup file isn't needed
any longer.
The problem is that mdadm still wants to find and recover from it.

I throughly tested mdadm restarting from a crash during the critical
section, but it looks like I didn't properly test restarting from a
later crash.

I think if you just change the 'return 1' at the end of Grow_restart
to 'return 0' it should work for you.

I'll try to get this fixed properly (and tested) and release a 2.6.4.

NeilBrown



----- End message from neilb@xxxxxxx -----

Thanks, I changed Grow_restart as suggested, now I get:
nas:~/mdadm-2.6.3# ./mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sd[a-e]
mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 3 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array.

nas:~/mdadm-2.6.3# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : inactive sda[0] sde[6] sdd[5] sdc[2] sdb[1]
      2441543360 blocks

unused devices: <none>

which is similar to what the old mdadm is telling me.
I'll try to find out where it gets the idea these are spares..
Would it be a good idea to update to vanilla 2.6.23 instead of running Debian Etch's 2.6.18-5?
If there is anything I can do to help with v2.6.4 let me know!
Thanks,
Alex.

========================================================================
#    _  __          _ __     http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 #
#   / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _  nagilum@xxxxxxxxxxx \n +491776461165 #
#  /    / _ `/ _ `/ / / // /  ' \  Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux   #
# /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/   Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / NetBSD /Linux #
#           /___/     x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k  ARM9: EPOC EV6 #
========================================================================


----------------------------------------------------------------
cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs..

Attachment: pgpUcgzmxc7Gw.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux