Re: reducing the number of disks a RAID1 expects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"J. David Beutel" <jdb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Neil Brown wrote:
>> 2.6.12 does support reducing the number of drives in a raid1, but it
>>     will only remove drives from the end of the list. e.g. if the
>>     state was
>>
>>       58604992 blocks [3/2] [UU_]
>>
>> then it would work.  But as it is
>>
>>       58604992 blocks [3/2] [_UU]
>>
>> it won't.  You could fail the last drive (hdc8) and then add it back
>> in again.  This would move it to the first slot, but it would cause a
>> full resync which is a bit of a waste.
>>
>
> Thanks for your help!  That's the route I took.  It worked ([2/2]
> [UU]).  The only hiccup was that when I rebooted, hdd2 was back in the
> first slot by itself ([3/1] [U__]).  I guess there was some contention
> in discovery.  But all I had to do was physically remove hdd and the
> remaining two were back to [2/2] [UU].

mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hdd

Never forget that when removing a disk. It sucks when you reboot and
your / is suddenly on the removed disk instead of the remaining raid.

MfG
        Goswin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux