Re: MD RAID1 performance very different from non-RAID partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jordan Russell <jr-list-2007@xxxxxx> writes:

> Iustin Pop wrote:
>> Maybe it's because md doesn't support barriers whereas the disks
>> supports them? In this case some filesystems, for example XFS, will work
>> faster on raid1 because they can't force the flush to disk using
>> barriers.
>
> It's an ext3 partition, so I guess that doesn't apply?
>
> I tried remounting /dev/sda2 with the "barrier=0" option (which I assume
> disables barriers, looking at the source), though, just to see if it
> would make any difference, but it didn't; the database build still took
> 31 minutes.

Compare the read ahead settings.

MfG
        Goswin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux