On 5/16/07, Don Dupuis <dondster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/16/07, Don Dupuis <dondster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Don Dupuis <dondster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 5/16/07, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday May 16, dondster@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > > The problem arises when I do a drive removal such as sda and then I
> > > > remove power from the system. Most of the time I will have a corrupted
> > > > partition on the md device. Other corruption will be my root partition
> > > > which is an ext3 filesystem. I seem to have a better chance of booting
> > > > a least 1 time with no errors with bitmap turned on, but If I repeat
> > > > the process, I will have corruption as well. Also with bitmap turned
> > > > on, adding the new drive into the md device will take way to too long.
> > > > I only get about 3MB per second on the resync. With bitmap turned off,
> > > > I will get between 10MB to 15MB resync rate. Has anyone else seen this
> > > > behavior, or is this situation is no tested very often? I would think
> > > > that I shouldn't get corruption with this raid setup and jornaling of
> > > > my filesytems? Any help would be appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > > The resync rate should be the same whether you have a bitmap or not,
> > > so that observation is very strange. Can you double check, and report
> > > the contents of "/proc/mdstat" in the two situations.
> > >
> > > You say you have corruption on your root filesystem. Presumably that
> > > is not on the raid? Maybe the drive doesn't get a chance to flush
> > > it's cache when you power-off. Do you get the same corruption if you
> > > simulate a crash without turning off the power. e.g.
> > > echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> > >
> > > Do you get the same corruption in the raid10 if you turn it off
> > > *without* removing a drive first?
> > >
> > > NeilBrown
> > >
> > Powering off with all drives will not have corruption. When I have a
> > drive missing and the md device does a full resync, I will get the
> > corruption. Usually the md partition table is corrupt or gone. and
> > with the first drive gone it happens more frequently. If the partition
> > table is not corrupt, then the rootfilesystem or one of the other
> > filesystems on the md device will be corrupted. Yes my root filesystem
> > is on the raid device. I will update with the bitmap resync rate stuff
> > later.
> >
> > Don
> >
> Forgot to tell you that I have the drive write cache disabled on all my drives.
>
> Don
>
Here is the /proc/mdstat output doing a recover after adding a drive
to the md device:
unused devices: <none>
-bash-3.1$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10]
md_d0 : active raid10 sda2[4] sdd2[3] sdc2[2] sdb2[1]
3646464 blocks 256K chunks 3 near-copies [4/3] [_UUU]
[>....................] recovery = 2.6% (73216/2734848)
finish=4.8min speed=9152K/sec
unused devices: <none>
-bash-3.1$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid10]
md_d0 : active raid10 sda2[4] sdd2[3] sdc2[2] sdb2[1]
3646464 blocks 256K chunks 3 near-copies [4/3] [_UUU]
[>....................] recovery = 3.4% (93696/2734848)
finish=4.6min speed=9369K/sec
I am still trying to get where I had the low recover rate with the
bitmap turned on. I will get back with you
Don
Any new updates Neil?
Any new things to try to get you additional info?
THanks
Don
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
