On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:47:19AM -0800, Dan wrote: > Just about the only stat in these tests that show a marked improvement between > one and two drives is Random Seeks (which makes sense). What doesn't make sense > is that none of the Sequential Input numbers increase. Shouldn't I be seeing > close to a 100% improvement? This is not raid0! Since the drives are identical copies, you can't really optimize the sequential input since the input data is not stripped... OTOH, if you have two processes doing sequential input, then yes, each drive should work close or at the normal sequential input speed. Regards, Iustin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
