Unexpectedly slow raid1 benchmark results.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here are some bonnie numbers for a few tests:

2.6.20, only 1 drive active in md device (other drive pulled for testing):

Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
testbox          7G 45165  76 55461   8 25677   5 53573  90 66251   7 194.1   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
testbox,7G,45165,76,55461,8,25677,5,53573,90,66251,7,194.1,0,16,+++++,+++,+++++,
+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++

2.6.20, 2 drives in raid1:

Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
testbox          7G 47633  80 56795  10 27598   5 53675  89 66643   7 283.6   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
testbox,7G,47633,80,56795,10,27598,5,53675,89,66643,7,283.6,0,16,+++++,+++,+++++
,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++

2.6.21-rc2 (for completeness), 2 drives in raid1:

Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
testbox          7G 48128  83 56330  10 28183   5 53173  89 66425   6 307.1   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
testbox,7G,48128,83,56330,10,28183,5,53173,89,66425,6,307.1,0,16,+++++,+++,+++++
,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++

Just about the only stat in these tests that show a marked improvement between
one and two drives is Random Seeks (which makes sense).  What doesn't make sense
is that none of the Sequential Input numbers increase.  Shouldn't I be seeing
close to a 100% improvement?  Of course a 100% increase in performance is the
theoretical maximum, but these numbers show no improvement at all.  Both drives
are 320Gb Seagate 7200RPM Barracudas, part number ST3320620AS.  The motherboard
is a SuperMicro PDSME+.  Any insight will be appreciated.

Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux