Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Colin Simpson <csimpson@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:38:21 -0500
Cc: David Rees <drees76@xxxxxxxxx>, Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1172510818.11898.33.camel@cowie>
References: <1172258378.21648.51.camel@cowie> <45DF46B7.3040707@xxxxxxxxx> <1172406243.3765.29.camel@cowie> <45E1E051.1020908@xxxxxxxxxxx> <72dbd3150702260856p5053d028je85cacffb15a5536@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1172510818.11898.33.camel@cowie>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212)

Colin Simpson wrote:

SATA isn't supported on RH 4's SMART.


False.  Works just fine.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
  - From: Colin Simpson
- Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
  - From: Steve Cousins
- Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
  - From: Colin Simpson
- Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
  - From: Richard Scobie
- Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
  - From: David Rees
- Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
  - From: Colin Simpson

Prev by Date: Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
Next by Date: Re: end to end error recovery musings
Previous by thread: Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
Next by thread: Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]