Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Colin Simpson wrote:

They therefore do not have the "check" option in the kernel. Is there
anything else I can do? Would forcing a resync achieve the same result
(or is that down right dangerous as the array is not considered
consistent for a while). Any thoughts apart from my one being to upgrade
them to RH5 when that appears with a probably 2.6.18 kernel (which will
presumably have "check")? Any thoughts?

You could configure smartd to do regular long selftests, which would notify you on failures and allow you to take the drive offline and dd, replace etc.

Regards,

Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux