Re: disappointed with 3ware 9550sx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Martin Schröder wrote:

> 2006/12/10, dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > not so the 9550sx.
> 
> Next time check http://www.vendorwatch.org/ before buying hardware.

hmm maybe i'm missing something, but that site says 3ware is "somewhat 
friendly" regarding documentation... and i've found this to be entirely 
true -- their driver has been solid (and open source) since the hardware 
appeared, and years ago when asked how to get SMART from their devices 
their engineers gave out code on first request (hence the excellent
smartmontools support).

i don't care if they have support for anything other than linux and
the website seems to be faulting them for not supporting OpenBSD... and
frankly i can't blame 3ware for not supporting such an obscure OS ;)

i'm totally happy with how 3ware has treated linux.

although if i allow myself to be unrealistic i would love to see their DCB
documented, and/or some industry standardization in that direction... i
know there was some attempt at that but i'm not holding my breath waiting
for such things.  md/mdadm give me so much more than i think i'll ever
see from a hw raid costing ~$500.  (except NVRAM :)

-dean

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux