Gordon Henderson wrote:
I use option 2 (above) all the time, and I've never noticed any performance issues. (not issues with recovery after a power failure) I'd like to think that on a modern processor the CPU can handle the parity, etc. calculations several orders of magnitude faster than the hardware can chug data to & from the drives, so all it's really adding is a tiny bit of latency...
Thanks for this, and for the very informed responses from other subscribers. We have gone from 100GB of storage in May 2000 (which lasted us over a year) to 50TB today (which will last us three months), and a forecast of 200TB by this time next year! I'm learning fast :-)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
