Re: Large single raid and XFS or two small ones and EXT3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Neil Brown wrote:

On Friday June 23, francois.barre@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
The problem is that there is no cost effective backup available.

One-liner questions :
- How does Google make backups ?

No, Google ARE the backups :-)

- Aren't tapes dead yet ?

LTO-3 does 300Gig, and LTO-4 is planned.
They may not cope with tera-byte arrays in one hit, but they still
have real value.

- What about a NUMA principle applied to storage ?

You mean an Hierarchical Storage Manager?  Yep, they exist.  I'm sure
SGI, EMC and assorted other TLAs could sell you one.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


LTO3 is 400GB native and we've seen very good compression, so 800GB-1TB per tape.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux