Re: NVRAM support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday February 20, mirko.benz@xxxxxx wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We have applications were large data sets (e.g. 100 MB) are sequentially 
> written.
> Software RAID could do a full stripe update (without reading/using 
> existing data).
> Does this happen in parallel? If yes, isn't that data vulnerable when a 
> crash occurs?

md/raid5 does full stripe writes about 80% of the time when I've
measured it while doing large writes.  I'm don't know why it is not
closer to 100%.  I suspect some subtle scheduling issue that I
haven't managed to get to the bottom of yet (I should get back to
that).

Data is only vulnerable if, after the crash, the array is degraded.
If the array is still complete after the crash, then there is no loss
of data.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux