Re: raid 4, and bitmap.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday February 4, djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Ahh, i almost forget!
> > The mdadm is sometimes drop "cannot allocate memory" and next try
> "segfault"
> > when i try -G --bitmap=internal on 2TB arrays!
> > And after segfault, the full raid is stops...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Janos
> 
> I think i found the bug, its me. :-)
> 
> Today it happens again, and i see, i have misstyped the "internal" word like
> "intarnal".
> The mdadm is accepted that, and try to make the bitmap on NFS again, and
> crashed the raid.
> 
> I think it is neccessary to better test:
> 
> - the bitmap file's fs
> - the filename itself.
> (i mean did not allow the current directory, or the internal and none to be
> a separated option)

That sound's like a good idea... require a filename to contain at
least one '/', and quite possibly test the filesystem type.  bitmaps
are known to have problems on reiserfs and nfs.  They were developed
and tested on ext3 and there is some slightly hairy code in there...

Thanks for the suggestions.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux