Re: Good, recent FS comparison?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tyler wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> >Don't touch anything that doesn't do ordered-mode journaling, especially
> > if you use raid, unless your data-consistency requirements don't require
> > this.
>
> Al... you've given us some "do's" .. can you give us some "why's" to go
> along with them? :)  I would appreciate a run-down with some more
> specific info as to what/why.

see 'XFS corruption on power-blackout' thread

> >XFS is best, but does not support ordered-mode.
Highest performance ratio available due to low CPU usage.

> >reiser4 is still new.
New, but promising.

> >ext3 is rock-solid!
Low performance ratio due to high CPU usage.

--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux