Re: Good, recent FS comparison?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Tyler wrote:

You'd be best off trying some tests of your own, using files of the size and quantity you expect to use on a regular basis. I would consider ext3, xfs, and reiser3/4... and run some tests with them. We've had really good luck using XFS on large raids, I personally had a bad experience with reiserfs 3,

What kernels/XFS versions have you had good luck with? I have one large raid with XFS, and it keeps doing:

Corruption of in-memory data detected.  Shutting down filesystem

umount/mount fixes it...for a few days. I gave SGI's latest 2.4 kernel CVS tree a try, and found it broke NFS export of XFS, so I couldn't run it long enough to see if it fixed the first problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis                   |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux