You'd be best off trying some tests of your own, using files of the size
and quantity you expect to use on a regular basis. I would consider
ext3, xfs, and reiser3/4... and run some tests with them. We've had
really good luck using XFS on large raids, I personally had a bad
experience with reiserfs 3, it lost data on a USB based drive, as if it
were never even there, even after trying the recovery tools.
Regards,
Tyler.
Ewan Grantham wrote:
I've just setup a nice, 6-disk, USB-2 300 Gig/disk array, and was
prepared to follow my normal pattern of installing ext3 as the
filesystem. However, I saw the interview with Hans Reiser about
ReiserFS4, and am now wondering if reiser has really improved enough
to use it, or if ext3 is still the way to go?
Any thoughts?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.0/103 - Release Date: 9/15/2005
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
