in my previous test, using SATA, i got better result in 2.6 instead of 2.4. :P Ming On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 06:01 +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out why the last two numbers differ. > > > Have you checked what the performance with a 2.4.x kernel is? If I > remember correctly there was some discussion on this list that 2.4 > raid5 > has better read performance. > > Holger > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
