Re: sofware raid5 oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Farkas Levente wrote:
anybody has any useful tip about it?

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
 printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 0f94a067
Oops: 0000 [#1]
Modules linked in: cifs nls_utf8 ncpfs nfsd exportfs lockd sunrpc parport_pc lp parport netconsole netdump i2c_dev i2c_core ipx dm_mod e1000 tg3 floppy ext3 jbd raid5 xor raid1 3w_xxxx sd_mod scsi_mod
CPU:    0
EIP:    0060:[<00000000>]    Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.9-11.106.unsupported) EIP is at 0x0
eax: c1806138   ebx: c018961c   ecx: 00000016   edx: c035c7f4
esi: e7182200   edi: 00000001   ebp: c18fb380   esp: f7878f34
ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Process md2_raid5 (pid: 224, threadinfo=f7878000 task=f7872600)
Stack: f7b973c0 f8879a26  md_thread+0x20d/0x23a
 [<c011ceaf>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
 [<c030ce1a>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x14
 [<c011ceaf>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
 [<c02a183f>] md_thread+0x0/0x23a
 [<c01041d9>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
Code:  Bad EIP value.

Pid: 224, comm:            md2_raid5
EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] CPU: 0
EIP is at 0x0
 EFLAGS: 00010246    Not tainted  (2.6.9-11.106.unsupported)
EAX: c1806138 EBX: c018961c ECX: 00000016 EDX: c035c7f4
ESI: e7182200 EDI: 00000001 EBP: c18fb380 DS: 007b ES: 007b
CR0: 8005003b CR2: ffffffd5 CR3: 0fd6b000 CR4: 000006d0
 [<f8879a26>] handle_stripe+0xfca/0x1207 [raid5]
 [<f887a7d5>] raid5d+0x197/0x2ab [raid5]
 [<c02a1a4c>] md_thread+0x20d/0x23a
 [<c011ceaf>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
 [<c030ce1a>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x14
 [<c011ceaf>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
 [<c02a183f>] md_thread+0x0/0x23a
 [<c01041d9>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb

We're in handle_stripe with an EIP of 0. Perhaps a NULL end io function in the following:

(raid5.c, line ~1252):

        while ((bi=return_bi)) {
                int bytes = bi->bi_size;

                return_bi = bi->bi_next;
                bi->bi_next = NULL;
                bi->bi_size = 0;
                bi->bi_end_io(bi, bytes, 0);
        }


Is it valid to assume that bi_end_io is non-NULL in this context?

--
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux