RAID1 assembly requires manual "mdadm --run"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mitchell Laks wrote:
> However I think that raids should boot as long as they are intact, as a matter
> of policy. Otherwise we lose our  ability to rely upon them for remote
> servers...

It does seem wrong that a RAID 5 starts OK with a disk missing, but a
RAID 1 fails.

Perhaps MD is unable to tell which disk in the RAID 1 is the freshest
and therefore refuses to assemble any RAID 1's with disks missing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux