On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday July 5, eric@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
Active / Total Objects (% used) : 12080357 / 12132001 (99.6%)
Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 176776 / 176776 (100.0%)
Active / Total Caches (% used) : 66 / 101 (65.3%)
Active / Total Size (% used) : 668099.80K / 671784.20K (99.5%)
Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.01K / 0.05K / 128.00K
OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
6013634 6013300 99% 0.02K 26609 226 106436K biovec-1
6013306 6013297 99% 0.09K 146666 41 586664K bio
These two lines point to the problem - it is a leak of 'bio's.
This patch fixes it.
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ ./drivers/md/md.c
--- ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ 2005-06-30 11:07:38.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2005-06-28 13:02:04.000000000 +1000
@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ static int super_written(struct bio *bio
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rdev->mddev->pending_writes))
wake_up(&rdev->mddev->sb_wait);
+ bio_put(bio);
return 0;
}
Which kernel is that against? It doesn't apply against my 2.6.10-as7
nor David Kowis' 2.6.12.1 and 2.6.11.12 kernel source trees
(I don't even have the super_written function the patch is referring
to)?
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric@xxxxxxxxxx | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
