On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:03:35AM -0400, Guy wrote: > Also, a single RAID5 array on 24 disks would be high risk of a double > failure. I think I would build 2 RAID5 arrays of 12 disks each. Or 2 RAID5 > arrays of 11 disks each, with 2 spares. Just out of interest, why wouldn't you do RAID 10 of 12 pairs? Because of getting only 50% capacity, or?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
