active/active vs active/passive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The lecturer at the recent NG storage talk at Usenix in Anaheim,
indicated that it was best to avoid "active/active" and get
"active/passive" instead.

Does anyone:

1) Know what these things mean?

2) Know why active/passive might be preferred over active/active?

If I had to guess, I'd say that active/active means that n servers are
all watching n-1 others to decide when they should jump to life, while
in active/passive perhaps 1 server is primary, and the passive nodes
only monitor that 1 server.  Maybe?  Just a totally wild guess based on
next to nothing.  :)

Thanks!


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux