Re: Is there any way to delay reconstruction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



He mentioned he was on linux 2.4 - an unclean reboot will almost always
cause reconstruction there, as opposed to the aggressively clean 2.6
which almost never reconstructs.

I'd imagine with 800+ boxen, there's a few reboots a day no matter what
you're doing

-Mike

Derek Piper wrote:
> Why would rebooting the machines cause raid reconstruction? that
> sounds pretty bad to need to do that. Shouldn't that be addressed
> first? Then you might not need to worry about reconstruction so much.
> 
> Derek
> 
> On 5/25/05, danci@xxxxxxxxx <danci@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>>The problem is that usually fails with 'hdX: lost interrupt' if the disks
>>are busy due to RAID reconstruction - which happens a lot as some of the
>>800+ machines get rebooted for various reasons...
>>
> 
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux