Re: Raid 1 install revealed poor HD performance (I think)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




I was sure it would be DMA too :-). Wonder if multicount makes that much
of a difference?

It doesn't, I tried just before leaving this morning. No diff.


Either way, one of the first things I typically do on a server is add an hdparm line with whatever the disks need for that particular machine.

I don't understand the above "whatever the disks need" portion of this statement. Can you give me a little more detail?


So, even if you can't get your distribution to tune your IDE chipset and
IDE hard drives perfectly, with something like multicount or write
caching, its effective (IMHO) to just force your settings on boot.

What settings am I to force? And to what values? I guess I'm asking, are you saying just put the hdparm setting in a rc.local? If so, I'm still stumped on what those settings need to be


Thanks
Jay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux