Re: raid5 - failed disks - i'm confusing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 15:51 -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Doug Ledford wrote:
> 
> > Anyway, it might or might not hurt the drives to run them well below
> > their designed operating temperature, I don't have schematics and
> > materials lists in front of me to tell for sure.
> 
> ez enough to do ... its called "specs" on the various manufacturers 
> websites ... similarly for the operating temp of the ICs on the
> disk controllers ..
> 
> you're welcome to run your disks hot ...

I didn't say to run them hot, just design temp.  Overheating is bad,
just like you mentioned.

> i prefer to run it cool to the finger touch test as the server
> room to be 65F
> 
> and its a known "fact" for 40+ years ... "heat kills" electromechanical
> items,  car engines is a different animal for different reasons

Yes it does, and my point wasn't to say that it doesn't, just to say
that for the mechanical portion of electromechanical devices, excessive
cool can be bad as well.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://people.redhat.com/dledford


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux