Re: raid5 - failed disks - i'm confusing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Doug Ledford wrote:

> Anyway, it might or might not hurt the drives to run them well below
> their designed operating temperature, I don't have schematics and
> materials lists in front of me to tell for sure.

ez enough to do ... its called "specs" on the various manufacturers 
websites ... similarly for the operating temp of the ICs on the
disk controllers ..

you're welcome to run your disks hot ...

i prefer to run it cool to the finger touch test as the server
room to be 65F

and its a known "fact" for 40+ years ... "heat kills" electromechanical
items,  car engines is a different animal for different reasons

c ya
alvin
- feel free to second guess my reasons :-) ... there's no specs on that

>  But second guessing
> mechanical engineers that likely have compensated for thermal issues at
> a given, specific common operating temperature is usually risky.  Most
> people think "Heat kills" and therefore like to keep things as cool as
> possible.  For mechanical devices anyway, it's not so much that heat
> kills, as it is operating outside of the designed temperature range,
> either above or below, that reduces overall life expectancy.  Keep your
> drives from overheating, but don't try to freeze them would be my
> advice.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux