Software RAID0 behaviour/performance on ATA drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The recommended setup for doing RAID0 with ATA drives is
that each hard drive should be on its own IDE channel.  The
reasoning is so they can operate concurrently... i.e.  if you
put them in a master-slave configuration on the same channel,
you lose the benefits of striping since both drives cannot
use the channel at the same time and have to wait for the
others' read/write to finish first.

QUESTION:  Is this really accurate?  Is the md driver smart/multi-threaded
enough to read/write ahead non-consecutive sectors simultaneously?
When writing, for example, the 1st to 4th chunks of a file across
a striped two-drive array, would it write the 2nd and 4th
chunks on one drive without waiting for the 1st and 3rd chunks
to finish writing on the other?

If it can't, and the writes have to proceed in sequence/lockstep,
how can putting the striped drives on separate channels help?


-- 
reply-to: a n d y @ n e o t i t a n s . c o m
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux