Re: [PATCH 1/2] md bitmap bug fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2005-03-14T15:43:52, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi there, just a question about how the bitmap stuff works with
1++-redundancy, say RAID1 with 2 mirrors, or RAID6.

One disk fails and is replaced/reattached, and resync begins. Now
another disk fails and is replaced. Is the bitmap local to each disk?

And in case of RAID1, with 4 disks (and two of them resyncing), could
disk3 be rebuild from disk1 and disk4 from disk2 (as to optimize disk
bandwidth)?


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux